Research: KEEFE and COLLEAGUES,

Listed in Issue 273

Abstract

KEEFE and COLLEAGUES, 1. Department of Psychology, School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; 2. Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, PA, USA; 3. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY, USA. maoj@mskcc.org prospectively investigated in a trial of chamomile whether patient expectancies predicted efficacy and adverse events in oral therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD).

Background

Patient expectancies are hypothesized to contribute to the efficacy and side effects of psychiatric treatments, but little research has investigated this hypothesis in the context of psychopharmacological therapies for anxiety. We prospectively investigated whether expectancies predicted efficacy and adverse events in oral therapy for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), controlling for confounding patient characteristics correlating with outcomes.

Methodology

Expectancies regarding treatment efficacy and side effects were assessed at baseline of an eight week open-label phase of a trial of chamomile for Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The primary outcome was patient-reported GAD-7 scores, with clinical response and treatment-emergent side-effects as secondary outcomes. Expectancies were used to predict symptomatic and side-effect outcomes.

Results

Very few baseline patient characteristics predicted either type of expectancy. Controlling for a patient's predicted recovery based on their baseline characteristics, higher efficacy expectancies at baseline predicted greater change on the GAD-7 (adjusted β = -0.19, p = 0.011). Efficacy expectancies also predicted a higher likelihood of attaining clinical response (adjusted odds ratio = 1.69, p = 0.002). Patients with higher side effect expectancies reported more side effects (adjusted log expected count = 0.26, p = 0.038). Efficacy expectancies were unrelated to side effect reports (log expected count = -0.05, p = 0.680), and side effect expectancies were unrelated to treatment efficacy (β = 0.08, p = 0.306).

Conclusion

Patients entering chamomile treatment for GAD with more favourable self-generated expectancies for the treatment experience greater improvement and fewer adverse events. Aligning patient expectancies with treatment selections may optimize outcomes. Registration: Trial Number NCT01072344 at ClinicalTrials.gov.

References

Keefe JR1, Amsterdam J2, Li QS2, Soeller I2, DeRubeis R1, Mao JJ3. Specific expectancies are associated with symptomatic outcomes and side effect burden in a trial of chamomile extract for generalized anxiety disorder. J Psychiatr Res.;84:90-97. Jan 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.09.029. Epub Sep 30 2016.

Munro Hall Clinic 2019

IJCA 2018 New Skyscraper

Scientific and Medical Network 2

Royal Rajasthan Cycle 2021

Amazon Wilderness Trek 2022

Cycle Kilimanjaro to the Coast 2022

top of the page