Research: RISBERG and colleagues, I

Listed in Issue 32

Abstract

RISBERG and colleagues, Institute of Community Medicine, University Hospital of Tromso, Norway studied patients attitudes to and use of nonproven therapies (NPTs) in relation to their opinions regarding the causes of cancer.

Background

Methodology

A questionnaire was distributed to 305 non-cancer patients in general practice and 252 cancer patients at Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Tromso.

Results

In non-cancer patients, significantly more NPT-positive compared to NPT-negative patients considered the environment to be an important cause of cancer (74% versus 52%), or that food and drink could be carcinogenic (57% versus 40%). In cancer patients, there was no such difference. 60% of non-cancer patients and 35% of cancer patients believed that life style changes could alter the natural course of cancer. For both groups of patients, those who were NPT-positive believed to a higher degree than those who were NPT-negative, that cancer outcome could be improved by a change in life style (69% and 48% versus 53% and 29%).

Conclusion

Patients positive toward NPTs have stronger beliefs regarding the importance of environmental factors than do non-believers and non-users of NPTs. Moreover, NPT-positive patients believed more strongly then NPT-negative patients that changes in lifestyle could favourably influence cancer outcome.

References

Risberg T et al. Patients opinion and use of non-proven therapies related to their view on cancer aetiology. Anticancer Res 18(1B): 499-505. Jan-Feb 1998.

ICAN 2024 Skyscraper

Scientific and Medical Network 2

Cycle Around the World for Charity 2023

Climb Mount Kilimanjaro Charity 2023

top of the page